Received: from srvr22.engin.umich.edu (root at srvr22.engin.umich.edu [141.213.75.21]) by srvr5.engin.umich.edu (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA25316 for ; Tue, 30 May 2000 01:11:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from synchro.com (cccox.ne.mediaone.net [24.147.232.109]) by srvr22.engin.umich.edu (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id BAA15336 for ; Tue, 30 May 2000 01:06:53 -0400 (EDT) From: "JudgeNet - the beer judge digest" To: "Digest Recipients" Reply-To: "JudgeNet - the beer judge digest" Subject: Digest for the period 05/29/00 - 05/30/00 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 01:04:59 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/digest; boundary="Next_Part_SYNC2251ABEC0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Hops: 1 Status: RO --Next_Part_SYNC2251ABEC0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Table of contents ------------------------------------------------------ Correct Addresses (David Houseman) --Next_Part_SYNC2251ABEC0 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: Received: from munin.btcwcu.org ([204.108.253.90]) by synchro.com with SMTP (Mailtraq/1.1.4.1123) id SYNC2101ABBED for judge at synchro.com; Mon, 29 May 2000 10:19:40 -0400 Received: from TR-housemdlrem (shiva2.btcwcu.org [204.108.253.141]) by munin.btcwcu.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id GAA18865; Mon, 29 May 2000 06:19:15 -0400 Date: Mon, 29 May 2000 06:19:15 -0400 Message-Id: <200005291019.GAA18865 at munin.btcwcu.org> X-Sender: dhousema at mail.cccbi.org X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: JudgeNet - the beer judge digest From: David Houseman Reply-To: "JudgeNet - the beer judge digest" Errors-To: judge-owner at synchro.com Sender: judge at synchro.com Subject: Correct Addresses Cc: board at bjcp.org X-Hops: 3 X-POST-MessageClass: 10; Mailing List Message In sending out judge mailings for both the 1st round of the regional AHA nationals and the local Buzz Off, I've had many, many returned mailings due to change of addresses. Where the new address was given, I've forwarded this on to Russ to update the database. If you didn't receive notification of these events, that may be why. These were at least within the window that they would return the flyers with the new addresses but outside the forwarding window. Many were returned that were outside the window of even notifying the sender of the new address. I encourage all the BJCP judges to keep our Program Administrator up to date with all change of addresses. You can do this via EMAIL; check the BJCP web site for the Program Administrator's EMAIL address. I'm also in favor of moving all official mailings to EMAIL rather than SNAIL mail. It will probably be just as difficult keeping up with changes in EMAIL addresses, however the cost of mailings for competitions and updates from the BJCP will be significantly less including the money wasted on mailings that get returned. How does the BJCP membership feel about the greater use of EMAIL over USPS? Perhaps only the yearly mailing is via the USPS; competition notifications would be by EMAIL? Thoughts? David Houseman --Next_Part_SYNC2251ABEC0-- Received: from srvr22.engin.umich.edu (root at srvr22.engin.umich.edu [141.213.75.21]) by srvr5.engin.umich.edu (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA25316 for ; Tue, 30 May 2000 01:11:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from synchro.com (cccox.ne.mediaone.net [24.147.232.109]) by srvr22.engin.umich.edu (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id BAA15336 for ; Tue, 30 May 2000 01:06:53 -0400 (EDT) From: "JudgeNet - the beer judge digest" To: "Digest Recipients" Reply-To: "JudgeNet - the beer judge digest" Subject: Digest for the period 05/29/00 - 05/30/00 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 01:04:59 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/digest; boundary="Next_Part_SYNC2251ABEC0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Hops: 1 Status: RO --Next_Part_SYNC2251ABEC0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Table of contents ------------------------------------------------------ Correct Addresses (David Houseman) --Next_Part_SYNC2251ABEC0 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: Received: from munin.btcwcu.org ([204.108.253.90]) by synchro.com with SMTP (Mailtraq/1.1.4.1123) id SYNC2101ABBED for judge at synchro.com; Mon, 29 May 2000 10:19:40 -0400 Received: from TR-housemdlrem (shiva2.btcwcu.org [204.108.253.141]) by munin.btcwcu.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id GAA18865; Mon, 29 May 2000 06:19:15 -0400 Date: Mon, 29 May 2000 06:19:15 -0400 Message-Id: <200005291019.GAA18865 at munin.btcwcu.org> X-Sender: dhousema at mail.cccbi.org X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: JudgeNet - the beer judge digest From: David Houseman Reply-To: "JudgeNet - the beer judge digest" Errors-To: judge-owner at synchro.com Sender: judge at synchro.com Subject: Correct Addresses Cc: board at bjcp.org X-Hops: 3 X-POST-MessageClass: 10; Mailing List Message In sending out judge mailings for both the 1st round of the regional AHA nationals and the local Buzz Off, I've had many, many returned mailings due to change of addresses. Where the new address was given, I've forwarded this on to Russ to update the database. If you didn't receive notification of these events, that may be why. These were at least within the window that they would return the flyers with the new addresses but outside the forwarding window. Many were returned that were outside the window of even notifying the sender of the new address. I encourage all the BJCP judges to keep our Program Administrator up to date with all change of addresses. You can do this via EMAIL; check the BJCP web site for the Program Administrator's EMAIL address. I'm also in favor of moving all official mailings to EMAIL rather than SNAIL mail. It will probably be just as difficult keeping up with changes in EMAIL addresses, however the cost of mailings for competitions and updates from the BJCP will be significantly less including the money wasted on mailings that get returned. How does the BJCP membership feel about the greater use of EMAIL over USPS? Perhaps only the yearly mailing is via the USPS; competition notifications would be by EMAIL? Thoughts? David Houseman --Next_Part_SYNC2251ABEC0--