Return-Path: judge-request at brew.oeonline.com Received: from srvr20.engin.umich.edu (root at srvr20.engin.umich.edu [141.212.2.26]) by srvr5.engin.umich.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA16138 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 1998 01:01:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from twins.rs.itd.umich.edu (twins.rs.itd.umich.edu [141.211.83.39]) by srvr20.engin.umich.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA22380 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 1998 01:01:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from root at localhost) by twins.rs.itd.umich.edu (8.8.6/2.5) with X.500 id BAA10957; Mon, 20 Jul 1998 01:01:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from brew.oeonline.com (brew.oeonline.com [206.31.224.50]) by twins.rs.itd.umich.edu (8.8.6/2.5) with ESMTP id BAA10947; Mon, 20 Jul 1998 01:01:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from root at localhost) by brew.oeonline.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) id AAA25528 for realjudge; Mon, 20 Jul 1998 00:01:05 -0400 Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1998 00:01:05 -0400 Message-Id: <199807200401.AAA25528 at brew.oeonline.com> To: judge at hbd.org From: judge-request at hbd.org (Request Address Only - No Articles) Reply-to: judge at hbd.org (Posting Address Only - No Requests) Errors-to: judge-request at hbd.org Precedence: bulk Subject: Beer Judge Digest #24 (July 20, 1998) Beer Judge Digest #24 Mon 20 July 1998 FORUM ON BEER JUDGING AND RELATED ISSUES Digest Custodian: custodian at hbd.org Many thanks to the Observer & Eccentric Newspapers of Livonia, Michigan for sponsoring the Beer Judge Digest. URL: http://www.oeonline.com Contents: Re: FW: JudgeNet (Dion Hollenbeck) BU's (AJ) A tale of two forums ("Pat Babcock") Re: Hop Go-Round (Jeff Renner) Beer Judge Digest to be turned off. ("Lutzen, Karl F.") Have you organized a competition lately? Send articles for __publication_only__ to judge at hbd.org (Articles are published in the order they are received.) If your e-mail account is being deleted, please unsubscribe first!! To SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE send an e-mail message with the word "subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to judge-request at hbd.org. **SUBSCRIBE AND UNSUBSCRIBE REQUESTS MUST BE SENT FROM THE E-MAIL **ACCOUNT YOU WISH TO HAVE SUBSCRIBED OR UNSUBSCRIBED!!! IF YOU HAVE SPAM-PROOFED your e-mail address, the autoresponder and the SUBSCRIBE/UNSUBSCRIBE commands will fail! YOU MUST BE A BEER JUDGE OR BE REFERRED BY ONE TO SUBSCRIBE!!! You MUST be a subscriber in order to post articles!!! Requests for back issues will be ignored. CUSTODIANS on duty: Pat Babcock and Karl Lutzen (custodian at hbd.org) "Not a publication of the BJCP" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 17 Jul 1998 18:44:20 -0700 From: Dion Hollenbeck Subject: Re: FW: JudgeNet >> Lutzen, Karl F writes: KL> I just received this note from Chuck Cox. JudgeNet is now KL> back online. This brings us to a point that I knew would KL> occur someday: do we continue to run the BJD in parallel KL> to JudgeNet (with the inevitable cross-posting, and possible KL> confusion)? Well, I say that we first get some feedback from Pat Babcock, since it appears that he would have been the one to launch this forum. Was it a lot of work and expense? If not, I strongly suggest that we move the forum back to synchro and share any of the new list members with Chuck and his efforts. If there are comments from Pat of "went to a lot of work and money", then I think it behooves us to plan long and hard how to best utilize both of these forums so that neither goes to waste. Let's be fair to all as best we can in an informed manner. dion - -- Dion Hollenbeck Email: hollen at woodsprite.com Home Page: http://woodsprite.com/hollen.html Brewing Page: http://hdb.org/hollen ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 18 Jul 1998 12:03:37 -0400 From: AJ Subject: BU's RE: > which calculated out to about 35-39 IBU's. The reality was > an average around 65 IBU's, with enough variation to make one > scratch their head in wonder. The variation among the beers is less surprising to me than the disparity between the predicted and mean levels. In the few of my own beers that I've tested the discrepancy is more like predict 40 and measure 42 -44. Were commercial beers measured for sanity checking ( I measure Pilsner Urquel at 37 though Miller says it's 43)? A 1 cm cuvette (the MOA isn't very definite about this but it's pretty clear that 1 cm is what's called for)? The instrument has been recently calibrated? Measured against an octanol - octane blank? I'm not trying to shoot holes here just wondering what might cause such a disparity (and wondering if I should be wondering at all - maybe the formulas are really that bad). How about the hops - were they measured (shake half an hour!)? ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 18 Jul 1998 15:00:36 -0500 From: "Pat Babcock" Subject: A tale of two forums Greetings, Beerlings! Take me to your lager... Only time - Karl's time, for the most part - went into the launch of this forum. I vote to shut it down. See ya! Pat Babcock in SE Michigan pbabcock at oeonline.com Home Brew Digest Web Site http://hbd.org The Home Brew Page http://oeonline.com/~pbabcock/brew.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 18 Jul 1998 14:27:21 -0400 From: Jeff Renner Subject: Re: Hop Go-Round Louis Bonham gives us a sneak preview of the HBDPAE results. I have been using the "Dr. Bob Technical's Hop Go-Round" for a year or so and find it gives me good results. It is simply a white plastic circular slide rule about 8" diameter. To use it you line up batch size and amount of hops, then line up % efficience and %AA, and read out IBU. On the back is a utilization chart which is the same, as I recall, as the one in the wall chart that come with the recent Zymurgy special hops issue (Rager's?) and a list of some typical %AA for some hops and typical beer IBU ranges. The only judgement call is utilization, the rest is simple arithmetic, which this does for you. I find it much simpler than electronics, and I like the visual aspect of this analog method. Plugging in the PAE hops that Louis provided gave these utilizations and IBU results: >23 g 10.5% AA 75 min. 30% 38 IBU >23 g 4.8% AA 30 min. 20% 12 IBU >23 g 4.8% AA 15 min 14% 8 IBU >23 g 4.8% AA 0 min. ~3%? ~2 IBU ______ 60 IBU This is pretty close to the mean of the brewers' results and the same as Rager's. I think this cost around $8, and I find it well worthwhile. I'm surprised that I haven't seen it reviewed in the mags. Jeff -=-=-=-=- Jeff Renner in Ann Arbor, Michigan c/o nerenner at umich.edu "One never knows, do one?" Fats Waller, American Musician, 1904-1943. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 19 Jul 1998 13:15:56 -0500 From: "Lutzen, Karl F." Subject: Beer Judge Digest to be turned off. Ok folks, I meant this digest to be a fill-in for JudgeNet as it seemed to be taking quite a while to re-appear. As it is back online, and I've heard from several subscribers saying to shut this one down, (none to absolutely keep it alive), this digest will be shut down on Friday July 24 (Thursday is the last digest). All current discussions need to be wrapped up by then, and no new lengthy discussions should be started. Take 'em to JudgeNet! Subscription info to JudgeNet: send a message to mailserver at synchro.com containing: subscribe judge I will keep the software for BJD on a "warm standby" status if we should ever need to resurrect the BJD. It was fun! ===================================================================== Karl F. Lutzen | Computing and Information Services Scientific Programmer Analyst II | University of Missouri - Rolla E-Mail: kfl at umr.edu | 114 Math-Computer Science Bldg. Fax: (573) 341-4216 | 1870 Miner Circle Voice: (573) 341-4841 | Rolla, MO 65409-0360 ===================================================================== ------------------------------ End of Beer Judge Digest #24, 07/20/98 ************************************* -------